In this section, the gospel of the kingdom was preached to the Jewish nation alone. No Gentile evangelism occurred. While some Jews responded to the message of repentance, the majority did not. Rejection of the message and its messengers intensified.
If it can be established that the gospels were written early, say before the year A. If they were written by the disciples, then their reliability, authenticity, and accuracy are better substantiated.
Also, if they were written early, this would mean that there would not have been enough time for myth to creep into the gospel accounts since it was the eyewitnesses to Christ's life that wrote them.
Furthermore, those who were alive at the time of the events could have countered the gospel accounts; and since we have no contradictory writings to the gospels, their early authorship as well as apostolic authorship becomes even more critical.
Destruction of the temple in A. This is significant because Jesus had prophesied concerning the temple when He said "As for these things which you are looking at, the days will come in which there will not be left one stone upon another which will not be torn down.
This prophecy was fulfilled in A. The gold in the temple melted down between the stone walls; and the Romans took the walls apart, stone by stone, to get the gold. Such an obvious fulfillment of Jesus' prophecy most likely would have been recorded as such by the gospel writers who were fond of mentioning fulfillment of prophecy if they had been written after A.
Also, if the gospels were fabrications of mythical events, then anything to bolster the Messianic claims--such as the destruction of the temple as Jesus said--would surely have been included.
But, it was not included suggesting that the gospels at least Matthew, Mark, and Luke were written before A. Similarly, this argument is important when we consider the dating of the book of Acts which was written after the gospel of Luke and by Luke himself.
Acts is a history of the Christian church right after Jesus' ascension.
Acts also fails to mention the incredibly significant events of A. Remember, Acts is a book of history concerning the Christians and the Jews. The fact that the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple is not recorded is very strong evidence that Acts was written before A. We add to this the fact that Acts does not include the accounts of "Nero's persecution of the Christians in A.
If we look at Acts 1: Luke's Gospel comes Acts 1: The date of Acts is still in dispute, but the early date about A. If Q actually existed, then that would push the first writings of Christ's words and deeds back even further lessening the available time for myth to creep in and adding to the validity and accuracy of the gospel accounts.
If what is said of Acts is true, this would mean that Luke was written at least before A. This means that the gospel of Luke was written within 30 years of Jesus' death. Matthew The early church unanimously held that the gospel of Matthew was the first written gospel and was penned by the apostle of the same name Matt.
Lately, the priority of Matthew as the first written gospel has come under suspicion with Mark being considered by many to be the first written gospel.
The debate is far from over. The historian Papias mentions that the gospel of Matthew was originally in Aramaic or Hebrew and attributes the gospel to Matthew the apostle.Luke knew he wasn’t the first to write about Jesus nor did he claim to be; he wanted to write a gospel that shared the truth that had already been written but for a wider audience.
He was also arrested and later beheaded, he, John the Baptist, did not write any of the Bible. The author of the Gospel of John, who was one of the 12 disciples, . Luke not only authored the Gospel bearing his name but was a close friend of the Apostle Paul, accompanying him on his missionary journeys.
Bible scholars also attribute the book of the Acts of the Apostles to Luke. This record of how the church got started in Jerusalem is packed with vivid. Acts of the Apostles (Ancient Greek: Πράξεις τῶν Ἀποστόλων, Práxeis tôn Apostólōn; Latin: Actūs Apostolōrum), often referred to simply as Acts, is the fifth book of the New Testament; it tells of the founding of the Christian church and the spread of its message to the Roman Empire..
Acts and the Gospel of Luke make up a two-part work, Luke–Acts, by the same. 2) What books of Scripture did St. Luke write? St. Luke is identified by early (2 nd century) tradition as the author of the third Gospel and as the author of the book of Acts.
Luke, also called Saint Luke the Evangelist, (flourished 1st century ce; feast day October 18), in Christian tradition, the author of the Gospel According to Luke and the Acts of the Apostles, a companion of St.
Paul the Apostle, and the most literary of the New Testament writers. Information about his life is .