October 21, Gloria Kopp Writing Samples 8 The majority of Americans have a clear and strong stance when it comes to the death penalty, no matter which side of the debate they sit on. Supporters of this punishment argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime, and that justice is being served. My personal stance on the death penalty is that it is an outdated and ineffective punishment, serving no true benefit to society and causing more harm than good to society as a whole.
The most heinous of crimes are subject to the highest form of punishment — death penalty. Capital punishment has its share of supporters who believe in the merits of death penalty in fighting crime.
On the other side of the coin are those who view the punishment as unconstitutional, barbaric, and just plain cruel.
Many believe that the perpetrators deserve maximum penalty and the highest condemnation of all. This is clearly an emotional response, but it raises the question of whether death penalty is an effective way to deter prospective criminals. This essay aims to show two sides of the issue and argue that death penalty does not necessarily deter criminals from committing future crimes.
The main argument in support of death penalty is its perceived deterrent effect. In his study on deterrence in support of death penalty, van den Haag acknowledges that even though statistical results are inconclusive, capital punishment is likely to deter people from committing crimes because of fear of death, and more so if it is a death ordered by law.
He states that death penalty permanently incapacitates the offender from committing future crimes. He highlights that it is the most feared form of punishment and because of its finality, it could deter prospective murderers who are not deterred by long-term imprisonment.
He also puts more weight on saving the lives of prospective victims rather than preserving the lives of convicted murderers who may re-offend. Based on their two controversial studies, they conclude that for each execution, five murders are prevented.
Conversely, one commutation results in five murders. While statistics appear to strengthen the argument in favor of death penalty, they are just numbers that do not support actual crime rates.
However, the strongest arguments are those that criticized the studies for their faulty methodologies, insufficient data and flawed assumptions Liptak, The studies attempt to link executions with murder rate changes over time.
They ask whether executions made a difference in the crime rate at a given period. While this is a valid research question, studies fail to take into account other variables that have direct effect on crime rate such as the effectiveness of the judicial system, demographic changes, and economic conditions.
Critics add that the findings are skewed by data from a few jurisdictions, largely from Texas, hence, it is not representative of national data Liptak, With so few actual executions, the data is thin and conclusions derived from it are considered weak and misleading. In conclusion, it would be safe to say that there is no clear and indisputable evidence to suggest that the death penalty is an effective means to deter people from committing crimes or murderers from killing again.
The ambiguous results of studies make the deterrence argument weak. They are not enough to justify executions. It is surprising how politicians continue to support death penalty instead of looking into more effective and reliable alternatives.
Capital Punishment and the Supermax Alternative [Online] http: A New Debate [Online] http: The Future of Capital Punishment in the United. New York University Press.
Van den Haag, E.The Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies (Oxford Paperbacks) [Hugo Adam Bedau] on urbanagricultureinitiative.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. In The Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies, Hugo Adam Bedau, one of our preeminent scholars on the subject.
Death Penalty as an Effective Method of Punishment Essay Words | 7 Pages. Death Penalty as an Effective Method of Punishment An issue that has continually created tension in today's society is whether the death penalty serves as a justified and valid form of punishment.
Apostasy in Islam (Arabic: ردة riddah or ارتداد irtidād) is commonly defined as the conscious abandonment of Islam by a Muslim in word or through deed. It includes the act of converting to another religion or non-acceptance of faith to be irreligious, by a person who was born in a Muslim family or who had previously accepted Islam.
The definition of apostasy from Islam, and. The Death of the Moth. Moths that fly by day are not properly to be called moths; they do not excite that pleasant sense of dark autumn nights and ivy-blossom which the commonest yellow-underwing asleep in the shadow of the curtain never fails to rouse in us.
Some students who need writing aid try to save their money by using a very cheap essay writing service.
They find a low-cost website (which, of course, claims it is “professional” and “outstanding”) and hire cheap essay writers to do their papers. Death penalty is a human rights violation. With the death penalty, you are deliberately deciding punishment by death for a criminal.
This is the same concept as eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth.